Tony_E_Scavo Offline Image Upload: Off
|
WOW
i just dont understand?? I shoot professional Motocross and Supercross ( Indoor and Outdoor ) The outdoor stuff is stellar, have sold tons with my D2X, but the same is true for my SX images, i shoot regularly at hi-1 ( 1600 iso ) at 3.2 or 3.5 and process jpegs sending them through noise ninja...i will admit,at full size they look pretty noisy but in print at full page or less ( have had several hi-1 double trucks that were perfect ) they are beautiful, dont get me wrong, they dont look like fine art or high fashion prints but they look like darn good sports photos...did i just get lucky? i dont think so, i think there is a method to the madness.
The D2X has such a high resolution that i think slow shutter speeds show flaw much more unrelentingly than say the d2H would, thats why i get as high a shutter speed as i can when shooting action ( unless im going for a pan, and event hen i more than double what i used to do with film ) anything under 1/800th/sec doesnt work for me, but when i can get above that magical mark...presto, the images are SHARP, noisy yes, but sharp and acceptable for sports with great color.
I think alot of people are expecting the D2X to be like the F5 which could be handheld in low light conditions and get great images, this isnt the same beast...nope, not even close in low light regard, the D2X does everything well except shoot beautifully in low light, you really gotta work for those low light shots if you have a D2X but it CAN work...me personally, im buying a canon strictly for the high iso stuff just to make life easier on myself, but everything else...belongs to the nikon.
To you guys who say you cant get sharp images during daylight with the D2X...look at my slideshow of pics i made with mine this summer and tell me the D2X cant make sharp images....ill call you a liar!
www.TonyScavo.com/slideshow/slideshow.html
Edited on Oct 11, 2005 at 08:22 PM
|