Vadim Chiline Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
p.3 #17 · Canon EOS 5D. New camera. Pics. | |
Well things have changed since that "era", and modern days have brought us technology right... Just like today I'd say wow, my PC is faster, and it's better for doing certain things. You can't deny a faster frame rate isn't gonna help the sports shooter, wildlife & event photographer, etc. I've done wildlife, and I love my 20D, but I can't deny, my friend's 1DMrkII is quite impressive in capture the moment... you just get more selection...
So let me rephrase, "3 FPS is a leap backwards from current technology that's available for certain work". 
In any case... there's always something better out there... and not always for everybody's taste.
RDKirk wrote:
Vadim Chiline wrote:
I think this could be the real one too... no popup flash... it's a little more sleek in design... and is very much a merge between a 20D and 1DMrkII... I just don't quite get the 3 fps... it's frustrating really... argh.. if it could have 5 fps... I would jump on it.... otherwise, it's quite useless for event and wildlife photogs.... maybe fashion shooters, some product photographers?
I'm not sure I'd go up from the 20D for this... then again... I do need to get a 2nd body... 
I find this an amusing statement. Back in the days of the might Nikon F2 and Canon F-1, 3fps was the max (except for the Canon Pellicle). Yet, many great sports and event shots came out of that era...so it can't be said that a 3fps camera is "useless" for sports and events.
|