imagexchange Offline Image Upload: Off
|
p.1 #4 · Your Zeiss 21/2.8 pictures | |
Guy has helped a lot of people with their lens choices over the last couple of years - myself included. Cost me a bunch of money too 
When I first bought the 1Ds mk2, I was struggling with lens performance on that camera. Quite simply, over half of my lenses were essentially unusable below f5.6, a place where I do a lot of work. These were lenses that had worked fine on my 1D mk2 and 35mm for years.
Along came Guy, Son and a few others talking about Zeiss and kindly doing comparisons for the rest of us. The idea of a Zeiss lens, obvious as it is, had not occured to me. Once I saw the potential, I was all over it, and believe me it is a big difference with a lens like the 21mm/15mm etc...
I used to shoot Zeiss 20 years ago, and I loved the clarity, color, and contrast associated with these lenses back then. Today, I have Canon FF digital with the previously mentioned Zeiss quality and the advantage of the Canon glass on the long end.
Sometimes, what a lens brings to the table can only be shown in the image, MTF as valuable as it is, does not illustrate the 3C's as I call them - hence the need to post photo's - yes the web is limiting, I know, but it's all we have. The Sigma is an absolute bargain for the price, I know as I tested three copies extensively, but it is nothing like the Zeiss. It is this difference that we are discussing, evaluating, and for some of us, an absolute necessity.
Regards
Andy
|