Peter Figen Online Upload & Sell: On
|
"You guys would have hated high ISO film"
On almost every job I shot for Mackie mixing boards back in the day, I shot both Ektachrome E100 and Agfa 1000, specifically for the grain, and still shoot Tri-X today. Plus a LOT of High Speed Ektachrome pushed to ISO 1600 and 3200. So, yeah, I guess I really did hate high ISO film
"Default “landscape” profile. I don’t remember adding but maybe +5 sharpening over the default (based on 1:1 viewing). The last shot is 2:1 magnification, which is unfair to anything but perhaps medium format. I didn’t add any noise reduction at all, mostly since any print I’m going to make isn’t going to be large enough to need it. Your AA filter on the 5Ds might be masking some of the noise, and any camera with one looks like mush at 2:1."
It sounds like you're using Canon's DPP software to process your images. Too many think that because it's Canon's own software that it must me better, but it's simply not. Even Adobe's software is better but not nearly as good as either Capture One or Iridient Developer for pulling the most detail with the least amount of visible noise. I have a 5DSR and often shoot it at 400-800 and never see anything like what you're posting in terms of what I commented on, hence the reason for my comment. What you posted looked a lot like the reticulation we used to see in improperly developed film. Maybe post a link to the raw file so people can post their own results in their favorite applications.
|