TANG0F0XTR0T Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
OccAeon wrote:
I can't imagine the D750 helping here.
If you tend to be someone (like me) who under-exposes and then bumps the photo in post, the D850 is a good bit better than the D810 at higher ISOs, because you don't get the pink tint that the D810 gets when bumping exposure. But if you usually nail exposure, the D810 and the D850 are about the same as far as high-ISO performance.
Comparing the D750 to the D850, you get around 1/3 stop noise reduction with the D750, but you also lose a lot of detail, even looking at the scaled images. Personally, my main problem with noise is the loss of detail after noise removal anyway, so the D750 and D850 are about equivalent in my view. Plus the D850 is going to outperform the D750 on low-light focusing. To me, even if it actually provided a clear 1/3 stop advantage, it wouldn't be worth carrying the extra body anyway for that small of a difference.
The D4s is much the same, except you get about 2/3rds stop. But the AF probably won't be quite as good, and you'll still have less detail. So unless you want a D4S for other reasons, I'd go with the D850, personally. That's what I did (even though I, too, don't care that much about the extra MP). ...Show more →
I agree about the D750 but it does acquire focus more consistently and faster than the D810 in dim light. I have fast glass as well.
A D4s sounds good but at that price I wish it was closer to 20mpx at the prices they go for here in the UK. I can get a used D5 for the price of a new D850. D5 only has 40,000 clicks as well.
Decisions, decisions........
Edited on Nov 27, 2017 at 01:49 PM · View previous versions
|