jcolwell Offline Upload & Sell: On
|
For many years, I used an 85/1.8 and 135/2L as backup to my 70-200/2.8L IS (I & II). I replaced them both with the 100/2.8 L IS Macro, which works much better for handheld shooting in low light, plus it brings an additional capability: 1:1 macro. The 135/2L is an excellent lens, but I was often having to use a monopod, to get steady images at lower shutter speeds.
I agree with @mb126 that there's no significant difference in sharpness between the 135/2L and 70-200/2.8L IS II, when shooting on a tripod; however, for handheld shooting, the zoom usually produces steadier images.
|