Isaacheus Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
I have the 20mm sigma, and use my sisters 35mm quite often - I'd still go for the 35 if you like the 35 length, the 20 has a few drawbacks to me that make the 35 useful in its own right, namely filters and weight. Ideally, getting both would be perfect for me. The 24 vs the 35 might be a different story - I haven't really heard much about this lens at all?
ashton lamont wrote:
I wonder whether its still all that relevant to go for a 35mm rather than the highly regarded Sigma 20mm f1.4 art when the bodies are now so high that you can easily crop - not withstanding what your own specific requirements are. I have a 5DS-R and two 5D-IVs and rather than the time-honoured 35mm and 85mm primes I got the 20mm siggy (the 35mm siggy has enough bad press to worry me) and use with my existing 50mm f1.2L I nearly bought a 50mm Sigma art as my Canon 50mm was borderline not economic to repair but the latter is weatherproof so I paid up. I also now have the Sigma 85mm f1.4 art and for my purposes it pretty much replaces my heftier Canon 70-200 f2.8L IS on the 50mp 5DS-R.
Pete...Show more →
|