bobbytan Offline Upload & Sell: On
|
Well said, Rasmus. I don't really know if the E-M1.2 performs well in low light i.e. less noise compared to the E-M5.2 but it would make sense that the later-generation Olympus sensors are better. I will hopefully be doing some night sky photography in Yosemite next month. Still agonizing over whether I should get the PL 8-18 or the super-compact, fast, rectilinear Laowa 7.5/2 lens.
Wilbus wrote:
Can't comment on the lenses as I don't have either yet but there are great shots on FM from both, the 300 F4 seems to generally produce better results then the PL 100-400 but at the expense of versatility of course. There are some who make the 100-400 sing though.
For my own sake, with m43, it's all about speed. The faster lens the better, the sensors and cameras are great but due to smaller sensors they are fighting a little up-hill battle. No use making that battle harder with slower glass for me.
If you compare E-M5 Mk II with E-M1 Mk I you have much better controlled noise for long exposures in the E-M5 Mk II. The E-M1 Mk I is horrific without long exposure noise reduction on. I did as test between them both (friend has got the E-M5.2)
The E-M1.2 again has as good or better performance as the E-M5.2 so I'd go for one of the newer cameras, meaning Mark II's and stay away from the Mk I's.
Focus on stationary birds should be no problem but like Bobby said, they're still not quite there for birds in flight, not compared to high end DSLR's. I'd say one generation more guessing from the Sony A9 which apparently is there already. ...Show more →
|