Fred Miranda Offline Admin Upload & Sell: On
|
Chris_88 wrote:
As always, take the compromise you're most comfortable with. If you don't mind the Otus-like weight and size of the Milvus, then that's probably the way to go. If you can live with slightly less correction, the Canon 35 1.4 ii is apparently pretty well corrected too, and slightly smaller. AF seems to work well on the a7rii too.
Don't get me wrong, I see the benefit of the ZM 35 1.4. Zeiss probably created the best performing compact 35 1.4 with that lens, but on the a7rii the field curvature gets in the way (unless you opt for a front filter) and using that lens and the TAP, while nice and all (who would have guessed that we would be able to AF m-mount lenses on an a7 series cam a few years back), I decided to go with the Loxia for my landscaping needs. That lens is far from perfect, but having a native mount solution is just hassle free and stopped down the Loxia is a great (albeit overpriced) lens....Show more →
I went full circle...for landscapes, I started with Loxia 35, then ZM 35/1.4 (with front lens and all), than ZA 35/2.8 and now back to Loxia.
For people/travel/general, I really like the 35/1.4 ZA...LoCA goes rampage but it's not hard to correct in post. (with this lens)
|