mb126 Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
Mike Jacks0n wrote:
The excessive CA was the reason I lost interest in the lens, but if you don't mind processing that out it maybe it's the lens for you. I just don't like the idea of rewarding certain optical flaws, especially when makers like Tamron, Sigma, and Sony are able to match, if not improve the formula for a similar or lower price. Granted, the Art isn't an "apples to apples" comparison because of the IS, but it and the Zeiss are likely a fair bit more superior in optics. Maybe this was an attempt to "protect" sales again...IDK. I just felt like value wasn't all there. Maybe I'll change my mind when I can get it on my camera, but I'm not holding my breath. ...Show more →
IS, snappy (so the initial reports indicate) first party AF, a pound lighter, and common filter size for $400 premium over the S85A?
Sounds like one of the better value propositions in the history of Canon L glass.
|