e6filmuser Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
LordV wrote:
Interesting- not sure how you have done it but these look more like paintings than photographs. As such I rather like #3
Brian v.
surfnron wrote:
Interesting Harold. I was thinking the same thing Brian thought ~ Ron
Thanks, Brian and Ron.
I have been puzzling over these images from TIFFs. When I was using Photoshop 7, which did not recognise my Olympus RAW files, I used Olympus viewer to open them and convert them to TIFFS, which are more amenable to processing than JPEGs, and I would then resize and save the processed files as JPEGs.
Having found TIFFS, I assumed that they had been converted from ORFs but had not been processed. For reasons I cannot recall, this seems not to have been the case.
I have traced the original RAW files and processed them by my current methods.
The one thing which I conclude immediately is that the f16 resulting from the lens being set at f11, with a x1.5 TC behind it, still gives insufficient DOF.
Here are the images in pairs, with the version form a TIFF first and the one form a RAW files second. I have cropped the reworked images similarly, to make comparisons easier.
I apologise for the initial error.
The last two images seem to have been opened for different white balances.
Harold
Harold Gough 2017
Harold Gough 2017
Harold Gough 2017
Harold Gough 2017
Harold Gough 2017
Harold Gough 2017
|