Home · Register · Join Upload & Sell

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
Username  

FM Forum Rules
Macro World Resource
  

FM Forums | Macro & Still Life | Join Upload & Sell

  

Archive 2017 · Three Printing-Nikkor 105mm Images

  
 
e6filmuser
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #1 · p.1 #1 · Three Printing-Nikkor 105mm Images


These were lurking deep in my image files. The context was the Printing-Nikkor (minimum aperture f11) on my Olympus EM-1 in 2014. They were shot in aperture priority, 1/60 second at f11, with twin TTL flash. [Edit] There was a x1.5 Kiron TC behind the lens [edit ends]

For reasons I don't recall, these were stored as TIFFs. I have ensured that they are sharp and removed any noise. At this stage anyway, they have not been cropped.

Harold



Harold Gough 2017





Harold Gough 2017





Harold Gough 2017



Edited on Jul 19, 2017 at 02:31 AM · View previous versions



Jul 19, 2017 at 12:45 AM
LordV
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #2 · p.1 #2 · Three Printing-Nikkor 105mm Images


Interesting- not sure how you have done it but these look more like paintings than photographs. As such I rather like #3

Brian v.



Jul 19, 2017 at 01:43 AM
surfnron
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #3 · p.1 #3 · Three Printing-Nikkor 105mm Images


Interesting Harold. I was thinking the same thing Brian thought ~ Ron


Jul 19, 2017 at 06:52 AM
e6filmuser
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #4 · p.1 #4 · Three Printing-Nikkor 105mm Images


LordV wrote:
Interesting- not sure how you have done it but these look more like paintings than photographs. As such I rather like #3

Brian v.


surfnron wrote:
Interesting Harold. I was thinking the same thing Brian thought ~ Ron


Thanks, Brian and Ron.

I have been puzzling over these images from TIFFs. When I was using Photoshop 7, which did not recognise my Olympus RAW files, I used Olympus viewer to open them and convert them to TIFFS, which are more amenable to processing than JPEGs, and I would then resize and save the processed files as JPEGs.

Having found TIFFS, I assumed that they had been converted from ORFs but had not been processed. For reasons I cannot recall, this seems not to have been the case.

I have traced the original RAW files and processed them by my current methods.

The one thing which I conclude immediately is that the f16 resulting from the lens being set at f11, with a x1.5 TC behind it, still gives insufficient DOF.

Here are the images in pairs, with the version form a TIFF first and the one form a RAW files second. I have cropped the reworked images similarly, to make comparisons easier.

I apologise for the initial error.

The last two images seem to have been opened for different white balances.

Harold





Harold Gough 2017





Harold Gough 2017





Harold Gough 2017





Harold Gough 2017





Harold Gough 2017





Harold Gough 2017




Jul 19, 2017 at 12:34 PM





FM Forums | Macro & Still Life | Join Upload & Sell

    
 

You are not logged in. Login or Register

Username       Or Reset password



This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.