Home · Register · Software · Software · Join Upload & Sell

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
Username  

  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | Micro Four Thirds Forum | Join Upload & Sell

1      
2
       end
  

75-300 Mark II vs Pana 100-400
  
 
nandadevieast
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #1 · p.2 #1 · 75-300 Mark II vs Pana 100-400


So here goes my Oly 300/4...
But as stated on another thread, I probably won’t buy RX10, not sure about that camera as a tele solution.
I am back in the market for a lightweight tele, and yes, both 75-300 and Pana 100-400 are the options along with RX10 IV.



Nov 09, 2017 at 03:57 PM
jefflee
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #2 · p.2 #2 · 75-300 Mark II vs Pana 100-400


I have both. Pl100-400 on a dual IS body is very good, Gx8 now but soon a G9.

I use the 75-300 on my Gx85 along with the Oly 9-18 as a travel kit, both give very good images on the Gx85.




Nov 09, 2017 at 06:34 PM
kimknapp
Online
• •
Upload & Sell: On
p.2 #3 · p.2 #3 · 75-300 Mark II vs Pana 100-400


I have the EM1.2 w/ 300Pro and the PL100-400.
I also have the RX10-iv.
You will only give up a very little with the RX10.
Here are a couple of example shots from the RX10, cropped a little. The Egret is straight out of camera, other than cropped. The Loggerhead Shrike is processed, but looked really good SOOC.
POST for the Shrike in LR: Sharpening 66, Masking 56. No noise reduction. Clarity 38, vibrance 36 (more to bring up the sky). Exposure +0.3. Highlights -55. Shadows +43.
Most of the POST was because i was shooting against the sky.
Both were raw.

I don't have the camera here, so I can't do an A/B comparison, sorry.
By the way, the RX10 had a very high success rate for BIF.

Kim



© Maynard Knapp 2017

1/1250 sec @ f/4.0 600mm (FF) ISO 160





© Maynard Knapp 2017

1/1250 sec @ f/4.0 600mm (FF) ISO 100




Nov 11, 2017 at 04:33 PM
Imagemaster
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.2 #4 · p.2 #4 · 75-300 Mark II vs Pana 100-400


The EM1 II with the P/L 100-400 gave me results as good as the 300 Pro:




  E-M1MarkII    LEICA DG 100-400/F4.0-6.3 lens    400mm    f/6.3    1/100s    64 ISO    0.0 EV  




Nov 11, 2017 at 05:45 PM
 

Search in Used Dept. 



nandadevieast
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #5 · p.2 #5 · 75-300 Mark II vs Pana 100-400


Tony,
Why did you sell it and move to Nikon, may i ask?

Imagemaster wrote:
The EM1 II with the P/L 100-400 gave me results as good as the 300 Pro:




Nov 12, 2017 at 07:10 AM
Imagemaster
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.2 #6 · p.2 #6 · 75-300 Mark II vs Pana 100-400


nandadevieast wrote:
Tony,
Why did you sell it and move to Nikon, may i ask?


Because I get better BIF results with the D500.



Nov 12, 2017 at 07:15 AM
nandadevieast
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #7 · p.2 #7 · 75-300 Mark II vs Pana 100-400


Thanks.
Tony do you find your Nikon lens sharper than Pana 100-400. You are using 200-500 and 300 PF right?

Imagemaster wrote:
Because I get better BIF results with the D500.




Nov 12, 2017 at 07:49 AM
1      
2
       end






FM Forums | Micro Four Thirds Forum | Join Upload & Sell

1      
2
       end
    
 

You are not logged in. Login or Register

Username     Reset password