dtolios Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
p.2 #8 · p.2 #8 · New Sigma 100-400 C to complement Canon 100-400 II? | |
jcolwell wrote:
For sure. I just figure that an EF-M version of a 100-400mm zoom would be quite a bit smaller than the Sigma C.
I have the EF 100-400L IS II, and I sometimes use it for travel. When I want to take less, it could be SL1 + EF-S, M3 + EF-M, and/or Fujifilm X, depending. I certainly would not buy an alternative 100-400mm full frame zoom for travel, unless it was a lot smaller than the Canon, and at least 'somewhat' smaller than the Sigma 100-400mm C.
Again, we don't dissagree, would be nice, but even for cropped bodies, everything but equiv. 35~40mm lenses end up being kinda big.
The Panasonic Vario-Elmar 100-400mm f/4-6.3 ASPH. O.I.S, a m43 lens, is also 985gr. & Approx. 3.27 x 6.75" (83 x 171.5 mm).
Sigma 100-400mm f/5-6.3 DG OS HSM C (FF) = 1160gr & Approx. 3.40 x 7.18" (86.4 x 182.3 mm).
Not much to be saved there...apparently.
|