Tareq Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
bergenor wrote:
Ok, on my humble opinion.....more FPS is a must.... I do a lot of horses, mostly quarter horses....and I do very little editing, I don't change "parts" I don't add or remove things from my photos. Lets say that the horse is running towards me, there's no timing involved on it, he will do the same thing, take the same steps every 1-2-3 seconds, feet up, feet down, head up, head down....nothing to do with my timing, ok. Now you add more things in the equation ... horses blink their eyes,jockeys do the same, jockeys will whip the horses, pull the reins, scream at other jockeys....not a single photographer in the world can be good enough to know when that will happen. But a very very fast camera will take what.....the races last 17 seconds....I start to take when they are on the last 10 seconds.....thats 120-130 frames to catch a perfect shot...leg up, eyes open, muscles working, bla bla bla.....
Some tracks have horrible light thru the track, but have good light on the finish line....a Quarter Horse will go across that "good light" in a tent of a second.....again, no timing, no luck, nothing that you can do to change that....so let the little asians work for you and take as many shots as possible.
I had a 7d and 7D2 and now I have a 1Dx and Im saving to get a 1Dx2 and the only reason is that the buffer is much much faster.
My two cents.... More frames made me away more money than good timing....Show more →
I know about that and i believe you, but others really are super humans on timing so they know about blinking or legs up or hitting the ball or kicking the opponents and blah blah blah..... no thanks, i depend on fps more than my timing, good luck with your timing.
|