jcolwell Offline Upload & Sell: On
|
As far as improvements at the wide end goes, I think that buying an EF 16-35/4L IS would be a good choice. Excellent IQ and very useful IS. OTOH, that really won't affect your workflow as far as correcting distortion goes. You can set up your workflow to automagically incorporate lens corrections, which would work for both existing lenses and new lenses, and so I think the primary consideration here could be, do you need better IQ at the wide end, or do I need IS at the wide end ?
As far as consolidating the 24mm to whatever mm range goes, I'm heading in the opposite direction. I've used the 24-105/4L IS, 24-70/2.8L, and 24-70/2.8L II. Earlier this year, I sold my 24-70/2.8L II (which replaced my Mk I a few years prior), because I prefer using either (i) the 24-105L IS, because of its extra versatility; or (ii) a prime lens, when I'm after the best IQ.
I'm currently waiting for the 24-105/4L IS II, that I pre-ordered on day-one. It should be here right some soon now.
|