Lance B Offline Upload & Sell: On
|
Ryukyu wrote:
Lance, are you still considering selling your 16-35 and 14-24 because of the Tamron?
I'm considering an ultrawide for architecture and I assume that fixing distortion in post is nt a big deal for any of these lenses, but I'm interested in your take for IQ.
Yes, I am still considering selling them or at least one of them. All three are easy to fix in post as they are linear distortion, ie not mustache distortion. You will lose about 1-2mm fixing the distortion of the 16-35, the 15-30 and the 14-24 less so.
They all have their advantages and disadvantages, you just need to work out which compromises fit your style best. For me, the Tamron is the best as it has the best balance of great IQ, zoom range, weight and size, ie I don't mind the weight and size! The 16-35 is a little lower on the IQ, but has great zoom range and is light and small. The 14-24has great IQ, but has limited zoom range and no VR but is also heavy and big.
|