DtEW Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
Daniel Smith wrote:
Am I looking at his comparisons wrong, or is the Fuji X type camera data showing it is even cleaner than the top of the line Canon and Nikon gear? That is on the site linked above.
therealthings wrote:
No you are correct, the X-T1 is superb with long exposures at base iso. Though if you compare the Fujis with e.g. a d810, i find that the blacks in the fuji clip more. Not sure why.
From what I understand, Fuji RAWs are a bit more "cooked" than others. Supposedly the process of demosaicizing the RAW files from the X-Trans sensor indirectly involves some noise reduction as part of the algorithm. Some details are necessarily lost at ISOs below 6400, as perhaps evidenced by the observed clipped/crushed blacks. This might be the reason why DXOMark can't come up with meaningful/not-preposterous DR readings for the Fuji X-Trans cameras.
|