Frogfish Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
JoshmkII wrote:
@owlseyes... well, a Nikon dealer agrees it seems that for low light the d500 isn't any better than the d800... I've also compared notes with another shooter here who purchased the D500 a little while ago.. she seems far from impressed on the high ISO claims .
I'm gonna play with it till Monday, hopefully I find it takes decent shots at normal ISO because I really like 10 shots a second
Wow. Just wow. Talk about BS. If I could be arsed I'd find one higher but this is at 2,000 (and heavily cropped too. Bird was about 60m away and with 20m to the background, which helps with the separation). This wasn't taken with an 'exotic' either, it was the 200-500. BTW I have had both the D800 and D800e previously.
The D500 is far more than just fine at high ISOs so your friend doesn't know what she's talking about. Hundreds of other good examples on FM too .. suggest you start searching on here before returning a perfectly good (nay, excellent) camera.
|