RexGig0 Online Upload & Sell: On
|
My EF 35/2 IS is far too useful for me to consider selling/trading when I finally do acquire a 35/1.4L II.
1. The 35/2 IS is nicely compact, which is, sometimes, necessary.
2. Image Stabilization is less necessary for wider lenses, but "less necessary" does not mean "never necessary." There are times IS makes a real difference, especially if I am fatigued, have had too much caffeine, or am pushing the hand-held envelope with a high-MP 5Ds R.
3. This may not apply to much of anyone other than myself, but I use a Macro Ringlite often, while shooting my forensic/evidentiary images, and the same Canon adapter that fits my EF 100/2.8L Macro IS fits my EF 35/2 IS, which is a very, very nice close-range wide lens. This afapter being relatively inexpensive, I bought a second one, which I leave on my EF 35/2 IS full-time.
An EF 35/1.4L II is on my long-term wish list. It can wait, because:
1. The 35/2 IS is really quite good, and
2. When I want to shoot in low light, with a 35mm lens, on full-35mm-format, I can use my Nikkor 35/1.4G on my D3s.
|