k-h.a.w Online Upload & Sell: Off
|
thomed11 wrote:
Thanks to all for replies about the Nikon VR I 200-400 and the TAP. Yes, I anticipated those problems. I realize would have to use support for the lens and let the body move. I'm thinking monopod? Also, I honestly forgot the lens doesn't have aperture on it. (Lens is at home.) Maybe as suggested this could work with an aperture control adapter? I just ordered Fotodiox, Nikon to M, maybe ordered the wrong thing. And, yes, I expect to have to "pre-focus" the lens. I guess I'm just a glutton for punishment, but I do remember that I love the 200-400 lens that I already own, as opposed to the Tamron 150-600 A mount with Lea3 adapter, it's acceptable, but certainly not the same image as the 200-400 plus Nikon D3 body I used to use with it. Really just looking for an affordable, acceptable long lens substitute. (Well, the 200-400 VR1 is affordable coz i already own it
I also have an old Sigma 135mm Macro lens I'm hoping will work with this? And, Nikon 70-200 VR2, and 14-24 Nikon WA Zoom (bubble lens), and, less notably, Nikon 50, 1.8.
I'll also try it out today with my M mount Biogon Zeiss WA, 2.8 21mm.
This sure is fun, just seeing what's possible!
Curious what you're all doing about lens profiles in Lightroom? I assume creating your own? How about in DxO Optics Pro 11?...Show more →
"I just ordered Fotodiox, Nikon to M, maybe ordered the wrong thing."
Well, if it is the Fotodiox adapter I got that lets me control the aperture then there may be an issue.
Mine doesn't fit on the TAP.
K-H.
|