Home · Register · Join Upload & Sell

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
Username  

  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | Post-processing & Printing | Join Upload & Sell

1      
2
       end
  

Archive 2016 · 4930K win7pro Samsung 950pro 512gb - no LR boost vs evo 840

  
 
skid00skid00
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #1 · p.2 #1 · 4930K win7pro Samsung 950pro 512gb - no LR boost vs evo 840


architect7 wrote:
I plan to overclock my 4770K to 4ghz soon which is supposed to create a little boost for the develop workflow process in LR.


Here: http://www.overclock.net/t/1411077/haswell-overclocking-guide-with-statistics

And these: http://rog.asus.com/242142013/labels/rog-exclusive/maximus-vi-series-uefi-guide-for-overclocking/

http://overclocking.guide/asus-maximus-vi-extreme/




May 28, 2016 at 11:24 AM
architect7
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.2 #2 · p.2 #2 · 4930K win7pro Samsung 950pro 512gb - no LR boost vs evo 840


skid00skid00 wrote:
Here: http://www.overclock.net/t/1411077/haswell-overclocking-guide-with-statistics

And these: http://rog.asus.com/242142013/labels/rog-exclusive/maximus-vi-series-uefi-guide-for-overclocking/

http://overclocking.guide/asus-maximus-vi-extreme/



Thanks!



May 31, 2016 at 12:21 AM
Alan321
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #3 · p.2 #3 · 4930K win7pro Samsung 950pro 512gb - no LR boost vs evo 840


Make sure that you told Lr where the new location of the ACR cache is. Simply relocating the cache is not enough because Lr might still be using or (even worse) building one at the old location.

- Alan



Jun 06, 2016 at 05:05 AM
Alan321
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #4 · p.2 #4 · 4930K win7pro Samsung 950pro 512gb - no LR boost vs evo 840


aubsxc wrote:
That being said, the the 950Pro will not provide any significant advantage to LR and PS users over a traditional SATA based SSD, even when connected to a board with a PCIe 4x bandwidth M2 connection.



I expect this might be where one of the high-end CPUs has an advantage - not so much in the number of CPU cores (at least not for Adobe s/w) as in the number of PCI lanes that it can utilise (40 vs 28) for speedy storage.




Jun 06, 2016 at 05:21 AM
alexdi
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #5 · p.2 #5 · 4930K win7pro Samsung 950pro 512gb - no LR boost vs evo 840


Just as another data point:

I told LR to import my entire 1TB photo collection last night. The import used about 20% of my overclocked six-core i7 5820K and no more than about 300 Mb/s of network bandwidth. Now it's churning through previews. That's using around 65% of the CPU. Most cores are at 50%, but there's one in particular that's maxed out.

By comparison, Capture One Pro saturated the CPU, used around 1 Gb/s of bandwidth, and imported everything five times faster. For SMP, LR is just coded badly.



Jun 07, 2016 at 11:40 AM
architect7
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.2 #6 · p.2 #6 · 4930K win7pro Samsung 950pro 512gb - no LR boost vs evo 840


alexdi wrote:
Just as another data point:

I told LR to import my entire 1TB photo collection last night. The import used about 20% of my overclocked six-core i7 5820K and no more than about 300 Mb/s of network bandwidth. Now it's churning through previews. That's using around 65% of the CPU. Most cores are at 50%, but there's one in particular that's maxed out.

By comparison, Capture One Pro saturated the CPU, used around 1 Gb/s of bandwidth, and imported everything five times faster. For SMP, LR is just coded badly.


Agreed, I find that LR I/O never evolved beyond SATA 3Gb/s.



Jun 08, 2016 at 12:45 AM
1      
2
       end




FM Forums | Post-processing & Printing | Join Upload & Sell

1      
2
       end
    
 

You are not logged in. Login or Register

Username       Or Reset password



This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.