bluloo Offline Upload & Sell: On
|
I own the MBV and MC-11 and I'd call the Sigma performance "nativish", for stills.
I compared the Art 50 1.4 and Zony 50 1.4, and found very similar performance - for my shooting style (others have reported otherwise, FYI).
I use the 50, 85 and 135 in the Art line, and like them all. Performance ranges from very good, to sometimes frustrating when the lens randomly hunts - but I did see some random hunting with the Zony 50 1.4 as well.
Expecting perfect native performance, from adapted lenses, isn't realistic - at least not at this point.
So, temper expectations and evaluate them, based on your needs.
dannyer wrote:
Hi all,
Sigma claimed MC-11 turn the Sigma ART lenses to native lens's features. AF-S, AF-C, EYE AF, high speed focusing etc. Im just shoot still. Anyone can advise above statement is true? Any tested and confirmed the result? Im in the middle of picking either MB5 or MC-11. Thank you in advanced.
Gears:
A7RII
Zeiss Batis 85 1.8
85MM 1.4 a
50MM 1.4 a
24-70mm 2.8 a OS
|