lorac Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
Cristalline wrote:
Thank you all for really helpful information.
Yes, the difference between 450d and d7100 was so huge, but is also true that I had not so brilliant kit lens then.
Dynamic range is also very important to me, because that gives a special accent to the shots. In my life I made pretty much post processing images, from editorials to landscape pics, but I prefer making pictures without too many filters and processing.
In the following days I will decide which camera and lens I will pick, because I don't want to miss these romantic autumn shots with red sky after the sun goes down. And then all sparkling days in December 😊.
I only have one more question. I think I will pick prime lens first because of sharpnes, speed and lovely blurred background. If I choose 85mm lens, is it possible to shoot indoor, like in home? Or with 50mm? Or is better 35? I remember that almost every time I used larger zoom of lenses. With 17-55 I mostly use 55. On 55-300, mostly from 150 up. All on d7100. Any other suggestions? If I chosse d7200, I already have borrowed lens 55-300. But if I choose d750, I'll I will go with prime first....Show more →
Sounds to me you could go full frame, not needing the "reach" going by the answer to my question a few days ago. Of course the choice is yours. Yea, you can shoot indoors without a flash with either camera being able to crank up the iso to 1600 and beyond. Be careful to expose properly or noise will be an issue even with modern sensors. Not all prime lenses provide good bokeh, it depends. If finances are an issue, the main benefit of the D7200 over the D7100 is the larger buffer, which doesn't sound like a major issue for what you shoot. High iso is maybe 1/2 stop better with the D7200 over the D7100. Just a thought.......
|