Home · Register · Join Upload & Sell

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
Username  

  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | Nikon Forum | Join Upload & Sell

1
       2       end
  

Archive 2015 · Nikon 180 2.8D Vs. Nikon 135 2D

  
 
ocir
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #1 · p.1 #1 · Nikon 180 2.8D Vs. Nikon 135 2D


Given both lenses have almost identical prices. Which one would you prefer if you do mostly family photoshoots?


Oct 26, 2015 at 08:14 AM
agelessphotog
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #2 · p.1 #2 · Nikon 180 2.8D Vs. Nikon 135 2D


Curious to see what people say also. Have the 135 2D and am debating on saving for the 200 F2 or just grab the 180 2.8D and save all that money.


Oct 26, 2015 at 08:27 AM
Danner
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #3 · p.1 #3 · Nikon 180 2.8D Vs. Nikon 135 2D


I have owned both (now shoot a 70-200/4G), and don't think you can go wrong with either. IMHO, the 135 (or even the 105 DC) gets the nod by a smidgen. However, if you have an 85, then the 180 would be a better compliment to that.


Oct 26, 2015 at 08:33 AM
Geoff CB
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #4 · p.1 #4 · Nikon 180 2.8D Vs. Nikon 135 2D


If price is a concern, 180, you can grab it for under $500 used.


Oct 26, 2015 at 09:12 AM
Diallo_Jamal
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #5 · p.1 #5 · Nikon 180 2.8D Vs. Nikon 135 2D


benjikan has both and I believe he has determined that the 180 is a bit sharper wide open. I prefer the rendering of the 135DC and as of now it is the only one of the pair I have,.


Oct 26, 2015 at 09:47 AM
Diallo_Jamal
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #6 · p.1 #6 · Nikon 180 2.8D Vs. Nikon 135 2D


Geoff CB wrote:
If price is a concern, 180, you can grab it for under $500 used.


Yeah, I forgot to ask about that. When I think of pricing of the two, I typically think of the DC being twice as expensive, rather than approaching parity.



Oct 26, 2015 at 09:48 AM
rlacy55337
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #7 · p.1 #7 · Nikon 180 2.8D Vs. Nikon 135 2D


I have owned both of these lenses. I enjoyed both and thought both were very good. However, I though the 135 was "special". It renders beautiful images and for portraits and people photography it was always my lens of choice and it never let me down.

Ron



Oct 26, 2015 at 09:49 AM
ocir
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #8 · p.1 #8 · Nikon 180 2.8D Vs. Nikon 135 2D


Ok, you guys are making it tough for me to decide.


Oct 26, 2015 at 10:47 AM
jbouchard
Online
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #9 · p.1 #9 · Nikon 180 2.8D Vs. Nikon 135 2D


I have 135DC and 180/2.8 Ai-S. I give the nod to 135 mostly because it is my more comfortable focal length. If I'm hanging around at a family gathering and taking informal shots, 180 is kind of long. With the 180 if I see someone I want to catch a shot of, chances are I need to take 1 or 2 steps backward, and by then the facial expression I was trying to catch is gone. If you don't have a tele-zoom, consider getting a 70-200 or 80-200 and enjoy the flexibility.


Oct 26, 2015 at 11:54 AM
jsv_20
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #10 · p.1 #10 · Nikon 180 2.8D Vs. Nikon 135 2D


I have both. The 180 is very sharp; the 135 renders in a different, more artistic way. You can't go wrong with either lens. If you look on the used market you can find the 180mm f/2.8 (non-D) for $300-$375 (which is a bargain!).

The DC has a little bit of a learning curve compared to the 180mm. Stopped down I don't like the way the 180 renders OOF areas (it can be harsh or odd at times). I would go with the 135mm f/2 DC because of that. Having said that wide open the 180 is no slouch.

Edited on Oct 26, 2015 at 03:08 PM · View previous versions



Oct 26, 2015 at 12:12 PM
Ray S.
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #11 · p.1 #11 · Nikon 180 2.8D Vs. Nikon 135 2D


I have the 180 and have used the 135 - they're such different focal lengths it's hard to think of them in any sort of comparison. Both have sublime bokeh, the 135 a bit more customizable with the DC ring. Also, as others have said, they're not even close to the same price. I found a really excellent used 180 for $400 - I've never seen a 135 in any sort of condition for less than $1000 and rarely that low. I found f2 was almost always too narrow at the distances I tended to shoot that lens, so I mostly shot it at f2.8, and I have a 135 f2.8 AI that was about 1/10 the price and is about 1/3 or 1/4 the size as the DC (and renders about 95% as well if not equally well), so I haven't been able to see clear to spend the money on the f2 DC version. I've rented it a couple of times when I had to have AF, but 90% of the time I'm good with manual focus on the AI lens. But at $400, the 180 f2.8 was a no-brainer - I really like having AF at that length...

-Ray

Edited on Nov 07, 2015 at 06:10 AM · View previous versions



Oct 26, 2015 at 12:20 PM
Frogfish
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #12 · p.1 #12 · Nikon 180 2.8D Vs. Nikon 135 2D


Another similar thread here : https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1393762

135 for me. More usable and flexible FL.



Oct 26, 2015 at 12:25 PM
benjikan
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #13 · p.1 #13 · Nikon 180 2.8D Vs. Nikon 135 2D


ocir wrote:
Given both lenses have almost identical prices. Which one would you prefer if you do mostly family photoshoots?


The AF-D 180 f/2.8 is my most used lens. I have both. 180 is a bit sharper wide open. But for an all round lens the 135 would be better for you.



Nov 02, 2015 at 01:54 PM
iamjoenish
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #14 · p.1 #14 · Nikon 180 2.8D Vs. Nikon 135 2D


I agree with the idea of the 135 being the more versatile of the two, especially for family stuff. My vote goes to the 135.


Nov 02, 2015 at 02:47 PM
jmai86
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #15 · p.1 #15 · Nikon 180 2.8D Vs. Nikon 135 2D


I used to absolutely love my Canon 135L.
After switching to Nikon, I found that the 135DC just isn't as good, so I tried the 180 instead and was FLOORED. I've now ditched the 135 and 80-200 focal lengths in favor of the compact 180D. It's just amazing.

Advantages over 135:
- Compression! You can't fake compression effects. Having huge, diffuse bokeh balls in a portrait is wonderful sometimes.
- Half the price
- Not as bulky

In a way the preference is entirely dependent on your kit arrangement though. I use my 85G a lot, so the 180 just makes more sense to have. That combined with a 28 and 50G and I can shoot anything in any light without breaking my back. In my Canon days I would carry the 135L with a 24 and 50L. It was a nice setup but heavy, and not as versatile as my Nikon 4 prime kit.



Nov 02, 2015 at 06:48 PM
DaveOls
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #16 · p.1 #16 · Nikon 180 2.8D Vs. Nikon 135 2D


I'm surprised that no one asked what camera he is using. I assume it is a full frame because he is inquiring about these two fairly long lenses.


Nov 03, 2015 at 07:09 AM
agelessphotog
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #17 · p.1 #17 · Nikon 180 2.8D Vs. Nikon 135 2D


jmai86 wrote:
I used to absolutely love my Canon 135L.
After switching to Nikon, I found that the 135DC just isn't as good, so I tried the 180 instead and was FLOORED. I've now ditched the 135 and 80-200 focal lengths in favor of the compact 180D. It's just amazing.

Advantages over 135:
- Compression! You can't fake compression effects. Having huge, diffuse bokeh balls in a portrait is wonderful sometimes.
- Half the price
- Not as bulky

In a way the preference is entirely dependent on your kit arrangement though. I use my 85G a lot, so the 180 just makes more sense to have. That
...Show more

I would love to see some samples, I am pretty floored with my 135 DC but now am thinking maybe looking at the 180D. Could you post any?



Nov 06, 2015 at 09:28 PM
slrl0ver
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #18 · p.1 #18 · Nikon 180 2.8D Vs. Nikon 135 2D


agelessphotog,

Check out : https://pixelpeeper.com/

You can put in a lens/body/aperture and filter . Not 100% scientific but gives you an idea what's out there.

- slrl0ver



Nov 07, 2015 at 05:52 PM
agelessphotog
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #19 · p.1 #19 · Nikon 180 2.8D Vs. Nikon 135 2D


slrl0ver wrote:
agelessphotog,

Check out : https://pixelpeeper.com/

You can put in a lens/body/aperture and filter . Not 100% scientific but gives you an idea what's out there.

- slrl0ver


I'm not seeing what jmai86 is saying. The 135 looks superior to me in bokeh and skin tones. Checked samples.



Nov 07, 2015 at 08:46 PM
jmai86
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #20 · p.1 #20 · Nikon 180 2.8D Vs. Nikon 135 2D


agelessphotog wrote:
I would love to see some samples, I am pretty floored with my 135 DC but now am thinking maybe looking at the 180D. Could you post any?


agelessphotog wrote:
I'm not seeing what jmai86 is saying. The 135 looks superior to me in bokeh and skin tones. Checked samples.


I was referring to the comparison between Canon and Nikon 135s. The Canon 135L is superior to me over the Nikon 135D.

You can also look up samples on Flickr group photo pools for pretty much any lens.
https://www.flickr.com/groups/nikon180mm/pool/

I wouldn't take online samples as truth though - a lot of them can be post processed quite a bit, some better than others, and so your comparison may be skewed. The best way to compare would be to try them both out for yourself as I have and form your own opinion. Everyone's taste and preference will be different. For me the 135DC is fine but pales in comparison to the Canon 135L. And after trying the 180, I just prefer the focal length more so the switch was more motivated by focal length preference.

Here's one of mine with the 180D, light processing in Lightroom:
http://www.thingsbyjohn.com/Chicago/i-jwTpGDJ/0/X2/NIK_4575-X2.jpg




Nov 08, 2015 at 12:30 AM
1
       2       end




FM Forums | Nikon Forum | Join Upload & Sell

1
       2       end
    
 

You are not logged in. Login or Register

Username       Or Reset password



This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.