mstrickland Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
Ed Sawyer wrote:
f/45 seems like it would be well into diffraction - could probably shoot at f/22 and some front tilt to still retain the DOF.... just a thought.
Thanks everyone for your feedback. Much appreciated. Ed, this was on a 300mm lens and at f/22, the depth of field is still quite shallow, even with front tilt. This had front tilt applied and there's still a small area behind the midground that is out of focus. That's just part of shooting 8x10. At f/22, the area would be much larger. At f/64, diffraction is noticeable, but at f/45, the image is incredibly sharp - to the point where you can see dew on the grass you guys don't like so much.
|