|
glort Offline [X]
|
lilyphoto wrote:
Actually, I bet its very frustrating for the guests and family watching the ceremony as well. Probably more so for them than me. Not only can they not see the bride and groom and their facial expressions, but they also have a harder time hearing them recite their vows, since they are speaking away from them.
I have never heard a guest or relative express frustration at this at all.
I suppose they, Like myself, just accept that's the way it's done sometimes and it's a very minor thing if they regard it as any issue at all. They probably realise that its an important commitment between 2 people first and foremost rather than something put on for spectator entertainment or the shooter to get the best pretty pics for his blog.
Sometimes you don't get everything set up on a wedding like you would if you were shooting an advertising piece and that's just the way it goes and what you have to deal with. You either work around that and do what you can or you go find another market to work in. .
As for not hearing the Vows, can't say I have even been to a wedding where that happened in as long as I can remember. Even celebrants doing services in the park take portable microphones/ sound system these days, some even put a radio mic on the groom for good measure.
Can't remember the last church I went to that didn't have a mic going through the sound system in the place and most of the priests are wired for sound now even if there is just a mic on a stand for the couple.
Where I am, Audio is well and truly taken care of and it's impossible not to hear the B&G in any part of the church.
|
Jun 16, 2015 at 08:01 PM |
| |
|
|