douglasf13 Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
Tariq Gibran wrote:
I just never saw at at ISO 160 using ACR (if I remember correctly). That's the ISO I found to be the cleanest after testing for myself, though I remember the debate where many said 320 was the best.
Here was our discussion about this a while back with input by theSuede (you, me, Edward, Phillip, etc.), which was a "re-hash" itself of the subject.
https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1077866/0
Yeah, I remember that thread. I wish I still had the comparison images that I did between ISO 200 and 320 that I did in 2009 and posted on get dpi. I also think Andrey posted some pics, and it show that, while the lower ISOs had more DR, technically, there were weird color shifts in shadows below ISO 320, so, depending on how you plan on adjusting your raw file, ISO 320 may be the better option. You gain a little noise in the shadows, but loose the color weirdness. Both guys who built RPP used to talk about it a lot.
No bother. I don't have the camera any more, so it's all good, either way, and I really liked that camera. It's probably still the camera I'd buy, if I went back to DSLR.
|