adamdewilde Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
rscheffler wrote:
+100
I'm also seeing what seems to be motion blur or camera shake in some of the B85 shots, like of the 'belly dancer' on the beach, as well as I guess the older shots of the backlit girls in the grass. Those were ISO 100 1/320 f/1.8, which I guess might be stretching it a bit for optimum resolution if they were hand held, even with IBIS. Why not go ISO 200...? I guess time will tell once member here get their hands on the lens and give it a good workout, but right now, some images just don't seem to have a degree of fine detail sharpness I would expect, rather, kind of a coarse sharpness that looks more like slightly missed focus that was then sharpened in post... Yet other images are razor sharp, so kind of bewildering.
As for the B25, I really like the 'car 1' and 'car 2' shots. I agree Edward, it would be nice to see more distant subject images. There are a few cityscapes at Lake Lucerne, but it's difficult to know if it's just SOOC Jpegs, as the fine details feel a bit coarse and under resolved.
Regarding 75 APO and ZM85/2 veiling flare... I am also seeing this at times with the 90AA. Bright areas just outside the frame, such as an overcast sky, when photographing a relatively dark subject that fills the frame, tends to showcase veiling flare bleeding in from the out of frame bright area. In this respect, I think the 90 Summarit was a bit better....Show more →
Yep, also happens with the 90APO. But slightly different, in the sense that you could almost see the direction of the veiling flare, whereas with the 75APO it's a full frame wash most of the time.
|