takowasa Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
lowa2 wrote:
A stable viewfinder yields better AF as the AF sensors are also getting a more stable signal.
I'm sure Canon makes a lot of money on having IS in every lens. IE, they can charge more for each lens.
takowasa wrote:
I agree with both points. But IBIS offers some significant advantages over ILIS, not the least of which is the number of lenses that don't have IS. So, if and when Canon goes (adds) mirrorless, which will completely remove any advantage ILIS might have, will Canon finally implement IBIS?
I mean, I'm sure the 22 / 2, 24 / 2.8 STM, and 40 / 2.8 STM would benefit a bit with IBIS on current Canon mirrorless would be welcomed by many.
EB-1 wrote:
Well, that's like saying Canon should be Sony.
I don't follow. How does implementing a useful feature offered by Sony make Canon the same as Sony?
Are you unhappy with Sony?
EBH
Is the implication that if I want a feature that Sony has and Canon does not, that the proper course is to switch to Sony because no way, no how, will Canon ever implement a feature that Sony has implemented?
|