alba63 Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
sputnik wrote:
I started with Fuji X-E1, and later got the X-E2 and X-T1. But I knew I had to try the Sony A7 at some point. I agree that the Sony is a tad bit better for using legacy glass, but to me that difference was mostly due to focal lengths making sense to me. I used the Sony Zeiss 35/2.8 and a bunch of Nikkors on the A7, but in the end I was totally frustrated with the way the camera felt in my hands and the way the controls were laid out. Contrary to many people I also found the image quality less than stellar. Not bad really, but definitely not as good as the forum chatter would make you think. The Fujis on the other hand feels better to me, are smaller when you put the excellent Fuji primes on. Good image quality and excellent JPG:s. I've traditionally only shot RAW with my Nikons but with the Fujis I've shot RAW + JPG and oftentimes used the JPG SOOC....Show more →
I only briefly had the chance to shoot the A7 - and I kind of like agree. Compared to my main camera, the X-E1, the A7 has certainly more detail and less noise at high ISO, but I din't find tonality and the look better than the Fujis.
The smaller format sometimes looks a bit harsh, in the case of the X-Trans this is particulary true due to no AA filter, but all in all I am quite happy with the Fuji. Body operation is simple, lenses are very good.
Would Sony finally come out with that 85/1,8, I might be tempted to get a A7 II with this lens, but as it seems they go for another (fast) 35mm, 28 and the 90 macro. Strange decision that doesn't make me want it badly....
|