Shasoc Offline Upload & Sell: On
|
genefixer wrote:
Socrate
Now you have me baffled! I have been waiting months for the new 400 DO II to ship and now you got me thinking. Maybe I should save the $4500 and buty the new 100-400!
Useful comparison and great shots as I have come to expect from you!
Have a great holiday season!
Mike
Hi Mike! Thanks for your visit and the comments
Have the best of the Holiday Season
Socrate
---------------------------------------------
ELWOOD B wrote:
I don't shoot many birds, but I do shoot long lenses for sports. These photos are just superb. By glancing at the images I prefer the 1D files, as they just look richer to me, but it could be in the processing. I'd be happy with any of them.
Thanks. I concur I try to be consistent with my editing. All the images are edited in ACR with resizing and sharping done in PS. However looking at the raw files the MkIV's do have a better look What I also noticed is that The 7DII files have a more natural feel than the 7D.
Socrate
---------------------------------------------
surf monkey wrote:
It seems that the 100-400 ii is better on the larger sensors (i.e.: larger pixels), which makes perfect sense. The high MP APS-C sensors have always pushed the limitations of this type of lens, and apparently this one is no different.
The old 100-400 exhibited better IQ on my 5Diii vs my 7D.
I just got the new lens and have had no time to do any experimentation.
Thanks for your comments, Eric
Socrate
---------------------------------------------
big country wrote:
I swore i read on here the 1d iv is obsolete.
Socrate
|