GiovanniAprea Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
millsart wrote:
Its a tough situation to be in, and there is one one "right" answer.
Eheheheh...
I will add a few last thoughts...
1) even with the 18-55, I found the 14mm still very useful, so one obviously doesn't replace the other. I think most other users will also agree with this.
I do agree too but it doesn't mean the two can't live together, the 14 would be "the landscape lens", the 18-55 just a palliative whilst I can eventually get the 14.
2) if you buy the 18-55, you'll be that much further away from the 14mm with regards to saving money for it.
True, 300$ further :-(
3) have you considered the 16-55 lens ? It is not as fast or quite as good optically as the 18-55, but if you'd be using it stopped down it could work pretty well.
Its the "kit" lens for many of Fuji's bodies, and at least here in the states, you can find them super cheap, like $150.
Its wider, giving you 24mm equiv instead of 28mm, lighter in weight, and probably much, much cheaper
It could be a very nice temporary solution while you save most of your funds for the 14mm.
Nope, I am not interested, I would go primes not just for size but mainly for quality and if I gotta throw 150$ for that I will then better save and wait
...Show more →
|