millsart Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
AF is certainly better but I for one didn't find the high ISO difference that huge. A7s was better for sure, but I just didn't think it was quite as life altering as some reviews made it out to be. Good camera but not $2500 good for just the body to me.
Then again, I also didn't find the Nikon D4 so amazing that I felt the need the upgrade over my D3s.
RX1 AF can be annoying at times, especially lower light though, fully agree on that.
I guess if your trying to shoot lots of high ISO on your RX1 and also want to have a responsive AF camera for people in low light, makes sense to upgrade.
For me, the RX1 still works fine, as I'm not trying to use it to shoot an active kid or something like that, so I'm okay with the AF taking a little while to lock on, my subjects are fine with holding still.
I'd think of them as more of a compliment than anything. RX1 offers that great Sonnar lens, high resolution, built in flash, leaf shutter etc.
|