ckcarr Offline Upload & Sell: On
|
I see nothing in those pictures that would dictate one "must have" lens over another.
Plenty of people use the 14-24mm, 16-35mm VR f/4, 18-35mm, 10-24mm on crop.... 21mm Zeiss..
And, as mentioned above the tilt-shift lenses of 24mm, 45mm, and even 85mm
Focal length doesn't dictate whether a lens is a landscape lens. A landscape can be taken with any focal length... (Although it's true that most people refer to UWA lenses as "landscape" lenses).
As far as the 14-24mm lens. It's always in my pack. The size & weight is not really much of a deterrent. It's just what it is and you carry it. Water weighs a lot more.
newusaa wrote:
Canon seems to have the edge in the tilt shift department right now. I wish nikon would keep up in this regard.
This is a lot more photographer dependent than lens dependent. A skilled photographer has no problem with Nikon PC-E lenses when it comes to the final image (except at 17mm).
|