NathanHamler Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
p.1 #7 · p.1 #7 · Has Anyone Compared the D750 To The D7100? | |
johnctharp wrote:
Because the AA-less 24MP sensor couldn't possibly resolve more than the 16MP sensor with built-in blur filter? /s.....................Between the D7100 and D750, one can expect the D750 to outresolve the D7100 in every situation that is not reach limited when using the same glass......
Sooooo, if we go by your argument of a 24mp sensor with no AA filter, beating a 16mp sensor WITH an AA filter, then how does a 24mp camera WITH an AA filter (the D750) out resolve a camera WITHOUT an AA filter (the D7100), when they are both have the same total pixels? AND, some would argue that the D7100 has smaller pixel pitch, and therefore can result in finer detail. I'm lost with your logic.
I was simply referring that IN GENERAL (b/c the OP's original question was equally general to start with), the D750 is most likely going to have better image quality, simply from a less noise standpoint...which, is why i said below iso 400, you most likely won't be able to tell the difference. The D7100 is already great in the dynamic range department, i can only assume that with the increase in technology over a couple years, as well as the D750 being full frame, the dynamic range between the two is most likely close, with the D750 probably edging out the 7100 by a slight margin.
But, as for your argument of straight resolving power, at base ISO, i'm gonna say the 7100 will prob beat the 750, simply due to pixel pitch, and (like you said) no AA filter.
|