jeetsukumaran Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
p.1 #5 · p.1 #5 · More samples from the Sigma 150-600 f/5-6.3 Sports | |
The eagle shots are terrible, in both apparent sharpness as well as contrast. When I first saw them, I thought, "Oh no! It looks like it's going to be the 400 f/5.6 for me!". But then I scrolled down and saw the others and was (cautiously) impressed. The one of the guy eating his bag especially: that has quite a bit of pop on top of the excellent apparent skin-pore-revealing level of sharpness! Given that, I think there must have been wind ruffling the the eagle (some motion blur on the outer feathers), maybe in combination with hand-holding at a weird angle or after too much coffee or a very a long day etc., may explain some of the loss of sharpness in that series. In addition to the lack of sharpness, however, perhaps a bigger problem, is that the eagles have some really tepid/muddy contrast. Don't know what's up with that. But the other shots, especially of the bag-munching-guy, are encouraging, both in sharpness and contrast.
Edited on Oct 07, 2014 at 04:45 PM · View previous versions
|