mawz Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
Jorgen Udvang wrote:
One camera that is hardly ever mentioned when these things are discussed is the Df. But although the Df only shoots at 5.5 fps, it has a rather decent buffer which rooms 24 RAW frames or unlimited large/fine jpeg files. For those who can live with the larger format, this is still a decent alternative and maybe the closest we will ever come to a D700 replacement. It doesn't offer the reach of the D300, but with 16MP, it isn't too far off. realistically, a D400 would probably also have a 16MP sensor (if still available) to save costs on the processing side....Show more →
It's actually quite a bit off in pretty much all regards except overall pixel count. The Df lacks the reach, the speed, the AF, the Build, the UI, the battery life, the configuration flexibility, the ability to easily swap cards, the dual card slots (of the D300s).
The D750 offers about the same reach as a D300, much closer speed than a Df, a suitable buffer, improved AF, etc. Aside from the sensor it's a LOT closer to D300s or D700 replacement than a Df is.
The D400/D9300 would almost assuredly be 24MP. Nikon's pretty much standardized on that across the DX line, and a 16MP sensor would not offer sufficient differentiation from a D810 in DX mode.
|