BSPhotog Offline Upload & Sell: On
|
I thought about asking this over on the Nikon board, but I kinda wanted an answer based on wedding experience.
I currently have no macro/micro lenses and haven't been happy with my ring shots at the weddings that I've done thus far. They are okay, but they really don't have the level of detail that I'd like and could get by just being closer. Below are three options that I've come up with, so please weigh in with any experience that you have--or just tell me I'm dumb if there is a better or more obvious solution. Thanks in advance!
Current bodies and gear: D7100, D7000 x2, Sigma 17-50 f/2.8 OSM EX DG ABCDEFG, Nikon 35mm f/1.8, 50mm f/1.8, 80-200mm f/2.8
1) 60mm f/2.8 AF-D Micro - Substantially cheaper than the G version, not sure how much different in IQ. Allegedly slower for AF, but that is less of an issue and probably based mostly on the body it is used with. The 40mm DX micro lens could be an option, but I am hoping to move toward FX next year.
2) Kenko extension tubes - I've read about these some and think that they might be a viable option, but I don't really have a grasp on their usage and IQ. The consensus seems to be that they are overpriced for what they are and that IQ will be less than a true macro lens...but which one? Certainly lower IQ than the 105 VR micro, but what about the 60mm AF-D that I am considering?
3) This might be a little out there, but maybe not. What about a second hand p7700 or G15 advanced point and shoot? Both have wide apertures and accessible manual modes, along with silly-close focusing distances and have hot shoes for external lighting. I only bring these up because I am thinking about other uses as well. A 60mm f/2.8 isn't going to get much use for anything but detail/macro work since the 50mm f/1.8 is close in focal length and better (theoretically) in almost all ways. Extension tubes are also not going to see the light of day unless I am shooting tiny close up details. An advanced P&S might just be nice for daily life, scouting, or being unobtrusive. Am I overlooking something with this? (It is too bad that the Coolpix A or X100 both suck for macro)
Again, any input would be great--especially from anyone who has used any of these for wedding detail shooting. Thanks!
|