Chris Court Offline Upload & Sell: On
|
Hussain, I've switched out the transition from a fade to a wipe, which may be a little less processor intensive. I must say, however, that I definitely prefer the fade, so will likely ultimately end up moving back to that. I'm wondering what computer/browser you're using?
Thanks for the kind comments Leighton! Unfortunately there's an unavoidable tension between the quality of images and load times. On balance, I think I'd rather err on the side of displaying better looking images, rather than reducing resolution/quality for everyone, just to cater for those with slower connections. I do have sympathy, however, as I've been stuck with a stone age internet service for years, and have only recently had fiber hooked up.
As an essentially self-promotional site, I'm curious as to what you guys think of a) watermarking the images, and b) what would be the optimal number of images to display - both on the opening slider, and in the galleries. Too many, people start to get numb. Not enough, the impact is reduced.
I appreciate all the comments so far. Thanks a bunch!
C
|