hijazist Offline Upload & Sell: On
|
p.1 #14 · p.1 #14 · Canon 1dx vs Nikon d810 for portraits in non scientific environment ;) | |
dehowie wrote:
The point is that even with all the hype about Nikon's MP superiority the 1Dx combined with a nice lens takes all of that away.
Better more accurate AF combined with better glass equals better final image.
36mp is of little use if your AF and glass cant support it.
I am a Canon user, but it is really shocking that anyone can infer from such a test any conclusion related to AF accuracy, resolution, glass quality, sharpness, ISO performance, or any other measurement.
He compared a STOPPED DOWN lens with a lens used WIDE OPEN! With no tripod, different ISOs, different processing, different everything. I asked to have a side by side by side image at 5.6 and the response was, "sorry not using those lenses at 5.6" So if you shoot wide open, how about a side by side image of both of them wide open?
Both the 1DX & the D810 are phenomenal bodies targeted towards different types of photographers, but I am really trying hard to get my head around this test.
|