millsart Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
RX100 will be better at low iso's for things like landscapes where it does have a resolution advantage.
All and all though, quite a different shooting experience between a DSLR and a high end P&S.
I don't think either can really replace the other as they do quite different things and have different strengths.
I think the RX100 can make a great landscape tool as its small and light and punches well above its weight when it comes to IQ/resolution.
For stopped down landscapes, it could work great.
A DSLR, with even the cheapest 50mm f1.8 lens, is going to of course give a totally different amount of subject isolation ability, the experience of using an optical finder etc
Kind of apples and oranges.
Have to pick what is import to you
I've got the RX100 and mkIII version and they are great pocket cameras but I don't enjoy shooting them for fun, they are simply compact tools, and do their job well, but the experience of actually shooting isn't enjoyable. Its not bad mind you, but they don't inpsire me to pick them up like other cameras, typically with more traditional controls do
DSLR's on the other hand are great for fast action and a more traditional shooting experience. There is work I wouldn't do without a DSLR, but at the same time, there are LOTS of times where I don't want to carry a DSLR, such as on vacation or when out hiking.
Horses for courses
|