RustyBug Offline Upload & Sell: On
|
+1 @ Ben
Interesting how strongly the red (hue/sat variance) draws the eye. I can try to wander away via the leading lines to the right, but I keep circling back to the red.
Side note ... with the energy variance between wavelengths @ R,G,B, I wonder why they designed R&B with the same amount of pixels in the Bayer array. It would seem to me that R, GG, BBB would better reflect the energy balance (either by quantity or pixel size). That way, the noise levels we see in the blue channel would be better handled, and the red channel would be less likely to be overcooked.
Folks much smarter than I, but still @ the energy level variance not being part of the equation. Fuji had its Super CCD with two different sizes of pixels (large & small) for good DR and of course Fuji has the RGGGB for the X-Trans (which is excellent for mono), so it isn't like it can't be done. I get that the G is in the middle of the spectrum, so they kind of "divebomb Charlie", but I think that for ambient light shooters a re-weighted array would be most advantageous given the energy variance between direct sunlight and skylight.
The make "special" cameras for astrophotography ... I'd think a special array for landscapers / ambient shooters would be vastly more popular.
I digress ... bring on the pics.
|