johnvanr Offline Upload & Sell: On
|
I used to have the Canon 100-400mm, but mostly used it at its 400mm setting (don't we all). I'm not really into bird or wildlife shooting, but I used it mostly for landscapes. I tend to want to isolate subjects in landscapes, so it made sense. I sold it because I needed to free up some cash for other gear, but looking back through Lightroom, it's clear I used that lens a lot.
I don't want the 100-400mm anymore, as I'm trying to lower the weight (also replaced my 70-200 f/2.8 IS with a f/4 IS). I'm thinking of getting the 400mm f/5.6, but I'm not sure how much I'd use it. I also have an Olympus MFT setup and the 300-600mm equivalent lens for it, but I'm sure it's not as sharp as the Canon L. I could also use the Canon with my Sony A7r.
So, for those who have the 400mm and use it beyond BIF, how would you rate it? Worthwhile having it or one of those pieces that sits in the closet 99% of the time? Better to have a 70-200 and 1.4 converter and crop a bit?
(please don't suggest renting, as this would be one of those lenses I'd throw in the car and just see if I find a need for it, instead of going out specifically to use it; like yesterday when I passed a scene that I needed a super tele for, while I only had 50s in my bag...)
|