johnctharp Online Upload & Sell: Off
|
p.3 #6 · p.3 #6 · Zeiss Otus 1.4/55 vs. Zeiss Planar 1.4/50mm | |
macrobild wrote:
well, it is Otus, and with resolution/bokeh at 1,4 like none other.
and I use Leica, Hasselblad, Canon, Nikon,Sinar etc etc
I'd agree- the Otus 55 lands in the negative only when concerning it's Zeiss-endowed vignetting, if you ignore size, weight, price, and manual focus only. I can't say much about the Hassys and the exotic Sinars other than that they tend to be very well executed 'classic' designs, but I doubt that they realize the combined level of acuity and correction that Zeiss has on a pixel-per-inch basis.
As for Canon, well- I'd love to see someone put the better Canon glass to the test using the A7R, assuming that they'd fully mitigated the effect that adapters can have on image quality. The 300/2.8 II, for example, might give the Otus a run for it's money .
And Leica- I thought they had a stupidly well-corrected 50 in M-mount?
|