Steve Spencer Offline Upload & Sell: On
|
justruss wrote:
Let's recap:
- You never print larger than 20x30mp, and your current 16mp sensor satisfies you for this.
- You're like the XT files.
- You want something light and functional, including an at least moderately fast (but sharp/nice) 50mm, and the same out of a 35mm
- You're not a fan of the A7 files.
- You don't really care about resolution.
I think that points very, very clearly towards the Fuji instead of the A7r. You already love the sensor and find it does what you want. You like the files, and the resolution. You have immediate access to two category-topping lenses at the right focal lengths in the 23mm f/1.4 and 56mm f/1.2. You also have access to a broad range of Fuji lenses cover all sorts of focal lengths natively today, with the option to use 3rd party native mounts and adapted mount MF options.
To me, this is clear. For the OP, look at an X-E2 or X-T1 if you want to buy now, and you plan to hold the camera for a while. Go back to an X-E1 if you want something to hold you over while you wait for the next gen XT in either APS-C or FF flavors. ...Show more →
There is one thing left, however, that hasn't been mentioned. Perhaps the OP prefers really shallow depth of field, even shallower than the Fuji lenses can provide. If so, something like the Voigtlander 35 f/1.2 can't really be matched by the Fuji system. I agree all that is being said is pointing to the Fuji, but there is that remaining issue. Also personally, if I was printing often at 20 X 30 I would prefer the higher resolution of one of the Sony cameras. At 13 X 19 I find 16 mp is plenty, but I prefer the higher resolution if I go bigger.
|