timbop Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
Hey folks, I've got a question for fellow Canon wedding shooters with the 70-200/4 IS: How do you find it compared to the original 2.8, particularly with respect to weight, IS performance, and suitability for ceremonies? I've got an original 2.8IS, and by the reception my back is killing me after carrying it around for the ceremony and formals. I'm hoping that if I go to the f/4 IS I won't give up performance since the IS is a stop better than the original 2.8IS. Do I need to supplement with a 135/2 for dark churches? I rarely shoot the 2.8 wide open unless I have to in dark churches.
So, is it a pipe dream or can I cut weight in half without giving up much, if anything?
|