How do these compare to the 135L in the image look? Will the the 100 f/2 give a more 135L look than the 85 1.8?
Background: I sold my 135L and bought a 70-200mkII and miss the 135L look and don't have the budget to get another 135L at the moment. I have an 85 1.8 that I don't use very much. I am thinking to sell it for the 100 F/2. Would this make any difference?
Ken Rockwall has a subjective impression between the two- but the summary, I believe, is that the 85/1.8 has the better bokeh, while the 100/2 is fractionally sharper and has a metal filter mount.