NazgulKing Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
JHerr wrote:
>You don't see too many Sigma's being used by NASA
That might change once they get the repair bills for IMPACT DAMAGE that their lens receive while sitting completely safe in a impact proof box.
EVERYTHING IS IMPACTED
Every bloody forum I go to, you always have someone who has an axe to grind, and goes around to every thread that turns out like this about his experiences etc.
Honestly, it's tiresome, and if you want a nice story, here's one: I know someone who had a Sigma DP1. Guess what? The entire lens assembly fell apart. He of course didn't bother getting it repaired.
Sigma's lens mechanics and QC has always been shaky, and even the much glorified Art series still has a pretty large variance in the MTF measurements, as evidenced by Lensrental's own testing. If you got a good copy, good for you, and if you didn't, then well, sucks to be you.
|