jcolwell Offline Upload & Sell: On
|
p.1 #4 · p.1 #4 · Fuji X image quality compared to Canon 6D? | |
I own the 6D, X Pro-1, and X100s (among other things). The 6D has better high ISO performance (6400+), better centre-point AF in low light and AI Servo for moving subjects, and better battery life than the X Pro-1 (i.e. X-E1); otherwise, their image quality is very similar. IMO, in most situautions with static and slow subjects, the only major IQ distinctions between them are due to the lenses mounted on them, not the cameras themselves.
I recently posted a number of IQ comparisons between the X Pro-1 and 6D,
summary, https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1247748
comparison photos, https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1247748/0#11870671
I sometimes use the X Pro-1 + 14/2.8, X100 (now X100s), and 6D + 70-200/2.8L IS II at the same time, for intimate events. They all produce excellent IQ. The greatest difference between the Fuji and Canon cameras is colour rendering in artificial light, probably mostly due to differences in their auto-white balance (AWB) handling.
For scenic photography, I'm planning to get an A7R for use with my Canon and Alt lenses (see link). For other applications, I'll generally use 1D-series cameras or a combination of Fuji X and 6D, depending on circumstances.
Canon and Alt on A7R, https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1247661/53#11942785
|