Elijah Offline Upload & Sell: On
|
low325 wrote:
at 1.4, the 58 is plenty sharp...though the 70-200 really give a more flattering (IMO) perspective, FL and its really sharp.
but that swirly of the 58 :drool:
The thing that gets me is how much similar the bokeh SIZE is.
Quality, compression and shape of the bokeh is different.
I was usually a fan of the LARGER bokeh but It seems that it’s not that much larger, unless I go all in and get the 200/f2VRII
But heck, now I see why so many people say that it’s “3D looking” kind of images. When you look really close, the focused subject is not the same as OOF elements... I can’t even explain lol
I actually like the 58mm even more now, especially after viewing this comparison.
|